Arc A530M vs Radeon RX 7700 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7700 XT with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.

RX 7700 XT
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 245 Watt
58.43
+212%

RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A530M by a whopping 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.52no data
Power efficiency16.3519.74
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 32DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores34561536
Core clock speed1435 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2544 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate549.5124.8
Floating-point processing power35.17 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs21696
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Cores5412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 7700 XT 58.43
+212%
Arc A530M 18.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700 XT 22458
+212%
Arc A530M 7195

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD188
+213%
60−65
−213%
1440p102
+240%
30−35
−240%
4K57
+217%
18−20
−217%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p4.40no data
4K7.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 265
+476%
45−50
−476%
Counter-Strike 2 176
+450%
30−35
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
+422%
35−40
−422%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 199
+333%
45−50
−333%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+114%
70−75
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 145
+353%
30−35
−353%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+327%
35−40
−327%
Far Cry 5 188
+213%
60−65
−213%
Fortnite 230−240
+152%
95−100
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 278
+286%
70−75
−286%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+224%
45−50
−224%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
Valorant 290−300
+119%
130−140
−119%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 119
+159%
45−50
−159%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+114%
70−75
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 121
+278%
30−35
−278%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+26.4%
220−230
−26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 132
+257%
35−40
−257%
Far Cry 5 181
+202%
60−65
−202%
Fortnite 230−240
+152%
95−100
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 272
+278%
70−75
−278%
Forza Horizon 5 150−160
+224%
45−50
−224%
Grand Theft Auto V 166
+152%
65−70
−152%
Metro Exodus 152
+311%
35−40
−311%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 295
+502%
45−50
−502%
Valorant 290−300
+119%
130−140
−119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+114%
70−75
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+244%
30−35
−244%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+230%
35−40
−230%
Far Cry 5 167
+178%
60−65
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 231
+221%
70−75
−221%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+243%
45−50
−243%
Valorant 290−300
+119%
130−140
−119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 230−240
+152%
95−100
−152%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+202%
120−130
−202%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+250%
30−33
−250%
Metro Exodus 90
+309%
21−24
−309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5.4%
160−170
−5.4%
Valorant 300−350
+96.5%
170−180
−96.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+400%
16−18
−400%
Far Cry 5 157
+303%
35−40
−303%
Forza Horizon 4 197
+348%
40−45
−348%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+329%
27−30
−329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+275%
40−45
−275%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+250%
30−35
−250%
Metro Exodus 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+256%
24−27
−256%
Valorant 300−350
+214%
95−100
−214%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+254%
24−27
−254%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+100%
8−9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
Far Cry 5 82
+332%
18−20
−332%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+332%
30−35
−332%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+453%
16−18
−453%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how RX 7700 XT and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is 213% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700 XT is 240% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700 XT is 217% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 502% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7700 XT is ahead in 60 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.43 18.72
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 65 Watt

RX 7700 XT has a 212.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has 276.9% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1840 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 204 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 7700 XT or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.