Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Arc A770M

Place in performance ranking	188	43
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	73.37
Architecture	Xe HPG (2022−2023)	RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Alchemist	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	3456
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt (120 - 150 Watt TGP)	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	422.4	549.5
Floating-point performance	13.52 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 29.86

RX 7700 XT 57.80
+93.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11519

RX 7700 XT 22296
+93.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A770M 77403

RX 7700 XT 126733
+63.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770M 37375

RX 7700 XT 57340
+53.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770M 25563

RX 7700 XT 42801
+67.4%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770M 124487

RX 7700 XT 201871
+62.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	96 −90.6%	183 +90.6%
1440p	55 −83.6%	101 +83.6%
4K	38 −57.9%	60 +57.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

113

−70.8%

193
+70.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −94.1%	165 +94.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −161%	180 +161%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −43%	180−190 +43%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −34.6%	100−110 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	95 −66.3%	158 +66.3%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −26.7%	100−110 +26.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −40.4%	130−140 +40.4%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −16.1%	220−230 +16.1%
Hitman 3	85−90 −38.8%	110−120 +38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −31.9%	210−220 +31.9%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −20.5%	150−160 +20.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −22.6%	110−120 +22.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −57.1%	230−240 +57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −13.1%	140−150 +13.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −220%	272 +220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −116%	149 +116%
Battlefield 5	120−130 −43%	180−190 +43%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −34.6%	100−110 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −71.4%	132 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −26.7%	100−110 +26.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 −40.4%	130−140 +40.4%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −16.1%	220−230 +16.1%
Hitman 3	85−90 −38.8%	110−120 +38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 −31.9%	210−220 +31.9%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −20.5%	150−160 +20.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −22.6%	110−120 +22.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	211 −58.3%	334 +58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −44.6%	120−130 +44.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −13.1%	140−150 +13.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −42.4%	121 +42.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65−70 −91.3%	132 +91.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 −34.6%	100−110 +34.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −82.1%	122 +82.1%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −26.7%	100−110 +26.7%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 −19.7%	231 +19.7%
Hitman 3	85−90 −38.8%	110−120 +38.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 −106%	216 +106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	179 −60.3%	287 +60.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	51 −229%	168 +229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −13.1%	140−150 +13.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

−22.6%

110−120
+22.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −61%	120−130 +61%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −128%	98 +128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −130%	101 +130%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −44.7%	65−70 +44.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 −81.8%	80 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −45.7%	65−70 +45.7%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 −21.1%	270−280 +21.1%
Hitman 3	50−55 −55.8%	80−85 +55.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	82 −109%	171 +109%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −78.7%	134 +78.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −99%	193 +99%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −107%	120 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 −18%	220−230 +18%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−42%

95−100
+42%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −62.5%	65−70 +62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −58.8%	50−55 +58.8%
Hitman 3	30−35 −48.5%	45−50 +48.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −18.5%	210−220 +18.5%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −64.7%	80−85 +64.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 −43.5%	89 +43.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −115%	58 +115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −136%	59 +136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −57.7%	40−45 +57.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −63.6%	36 +63.6%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −65.2%	35−40 +65.2%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −139%	134 +139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	74 −31.1%	97 +31.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	20−22 −70%	30−35 +70%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−58.3%

55−60
+58.3%

This is how Arc A770M and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 91% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 84% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 58% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 229% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7700 XT surpassed Arc A770M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	29.86	57.80
Recency	30 March 2022	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	245 Watt

Arc A770M has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 63.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has a 93.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.