Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.93
+153%

Pro 5600M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232466
Place by popularitynot in top-10075
Power efficiency33.3823.56
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 12Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256096
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed770 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+150%
26
−150%
1440p35−40
+133%
15
−133%
4K27−30
+145%
11
−145%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+95%
20
−95%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+136%
22
−136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+95.2%
21
−95.2%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+169%
27−30
−169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+36.1%
36
−36.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+144%
16
−144%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+142%
24−27
−142%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+124%
60−65
−124%
Hitman 3 45−50
+100%
24
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−11.7%
124
+11.7%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+134%
35
−134%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+271%
17
−271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+161%
30−35
−161%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+12.2%
90
−12.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+126%
21−24
−126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+128%
18
−128%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+169%
27−30
−169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+53.1%
32
−53.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+200%
13
−200%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+142%
24−27
−142%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+124%
60−65
−124%
Hitman 3 45−50
+109%
23
−109%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−0.9%
112
+0.9%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+193%
28
−193%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+142%
26
−142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+170%
30
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+20.2%
84
−20.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+271%
14
−271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+113%
23
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+255%
11
−255%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+150%
21−24
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+124%
60−65
−124%
Hitman 3 45−50
+140%
20
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+383%
23
−383%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+238%
24
−238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+271%
14
−271%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+65.6%
60−65
−65.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+350%
14
−350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7
−114%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+232%
40−45
−232%
Hitman 3 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+174%
19
−174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Hitman 3 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+215%
35−40
−215%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+117%
12
−117%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+164%
11
−164%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%

This is how Pro 5600M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 150% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 133% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 145% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 500% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 12% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.93 9.46
Recency 15 June 2020 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 28 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 153% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 78.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 967 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.