Arc A350M vs Radeon Pro 5600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.93
+63.1%

Pro 5600M outperforms Arc A350M by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking230352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.5342.34
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 12DG2-128
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1000 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate164.855.20
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+62.2%
37
−62.2%
1440p27−30
+50%
18
−50%
4K12−14
+50%
8
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+44.4%
27
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+17.1%
35
−17.1%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+69.6%
45−50
−69.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+105%
19
−105%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+51.6%
90−95
−51.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+52.1%
70−75
−52.1%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+70.8%
45−50
−70.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+76.1%
45−50
−76.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+32.9%
75−80
−32.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+105%
20
−105%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+69.6%
45−50
−69.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+144%
16
−144%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+51.6%
90−95
−51.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+52.1%
70−75
−52.1%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+70.8%
45−50
−70.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+52.8%
53
−52.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+52.9%
30−35
−52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+32.9%
75−80
−32.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+156%
16
−156%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+225%
12
−225%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+66.7%
30−35
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+51.6%
90−95
−51.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+52.1%
70−75
−52.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+80%
45
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+174%
19
−174%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+32.9%
75−80
−32.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+63.6%
21−24
−63.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+64.3%
14
−64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+86.3%
70−75
−86.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+80%
24−27
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+40.5%
37
−40.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+54.5%
85−90
−54.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Hitman 3 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+73.2%
70−75
−73.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+73.3%
15
−73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+52.6%
19
−52.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%

This is how Pro 5600M and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 62% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 50% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 225% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5600M surpassed Arc A350M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.93 14.67
Recency 15 June 2020 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 63.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A350M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 75 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 56 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.