Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs Pro 5300M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5300M with Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), including specs and performance data.

Pro 5300M
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
15.58
+157%

Pro 5300M outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 157% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking346587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.6227.86
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Vega Renoir
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)7 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280384
Core clock speed1000 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate100.0no data
Floating-point processing power3.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+150%
20
−150%
1440p55−60
+150%
22
−150%
4K40−45
+135%
17
−135%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+182%
11
−182%
Elden Ring 45−50
+200%
16−18
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+168%
18−20
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+244%
9
−244%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+146%
26
−146%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+200%
14
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+72.7%
22
−72.7%
Valorant 60−65
+148%
25
−148%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+168%
18−20
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+238%
8
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+933%
3
−933%
Dota 2 55−60
+133%
24
−133%
Elden Ring 45−50
+500%
8
−500%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+115%
26
−115%
Fortnite 85−90
+139%
35−40
−139%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+205%
21
−205%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+273%
15
−273%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+180%
14−16
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+185%
39
−185%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+153%
18−20
−153%
Valorant 60−65
+417%
12
−417%
World of Tanks 190−200
+255%
56
−255%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+168%
18−20
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Dota 2 55−60
+40%
40
−40%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+100%
27−30
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+256%
18
−256%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+122%
50−55
−122%
Valorant 60−65
+226%
19
−226%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Elden Ring 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+284%
35−40
−284%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
World of Tanks 100−110
+148%
40−45
−148%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+210%
10−11
−210%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+386%
7−8
−386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Valorant 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Dota 2 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Elden Ring 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Fortnite 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Valorant 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%

This is how Pro 5300M and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 150% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5300M is 150% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5300M is 135% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 933% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5300M surpassed RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.58 6.07
Recency 13 November 2019 7 January 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 156.7% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 466.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 704 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.