Radeon RX 7800 XT vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	316	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	60
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	66.93
Power efficiency	24.08	16.50
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	TU117	Navi 32
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	3840
Core clock speed	765 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	75.60	583.2
Floating-point processing power	2.419 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	56	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1000 Max-Q 17.49

RX 7800 XT 63.02
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1000 Max-Q 6724

RX 7800 XT 24228
+260%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55−60 −291%	215 +291%
1440p	30−35 −307%	122 +307%
4K	18−21 −306%	73 +306%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.32
1440p	no data	4.09
4K	no data	6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −677%	241 +677%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −637%	258 +637%
Elden Ring	55−60 −309%	225 +309%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −109%	110−120 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −545%	200 +545%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −174%	96 +174%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −578%	488 +578%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −264%	171 +264%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −180%	110−120 +180%
Valorant	70−75 −319%	290−300 +319%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −109%	110−120 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −426%	163 +426%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −129%	80 +129%
Dota 2	60−65 −187%	178 +187%
Elden Ring	55−60 −335%	230−240 +335%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −85.2%	113 +85.2%
Fortnite	95−100 −160%	240−250 +160%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −453%	398 +453%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −187%	178 +187%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −213%	147 +213%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −76.2%	210−220 +76.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −180%	110−120 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −222%	170−180 +222%
Valorant	70−75 −319%	290−300 +319%
World of Tanks	210−220 −30.4%	270−280 +30.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −109%	110−120 +109%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −381%	149 +381%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −111%	74 +111%
Dota 2	60−65 −255%	220−230 +255%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −102%	120−130 +102%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −372%	340 +372%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −76.2%	210−220 +76.2%
Valorant	70−75 −319%	290−300 +319%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 −419%	140 +419%
Elden Ring	27−30 −464%	150−160 +464%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −419%	140 +419%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −8.7%	170−180 +8.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −375%	75−80 +375%
World of Tanks	120−130 −253%	400−450 +253%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −142%	85−90 +142%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −547%	97 +547%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −269%	48 +269%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −256%	160−170 +256%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −452%	243 +452%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −279%	148 +279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −539%	147 +539%
Valorant	40−45 −480%	250−260 +480%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −223%	42 +223%
Dota 2	30−33 −407%	152 +407%
Elden Ring	12−14 −583%	80−85 +583%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−33 −407%	152 +407%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −425%	63 +425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −302%	200−210 +302%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −355%	50−55 +355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −407%	152 +407%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −376%	80−85 +376%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −477%	75−80 +477%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −340%	22 +340%
Dota 2	30−33 −233%	100−105 +233%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −377%	100−110 +377%
Fortnite	20−22 −380%	95−100 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −420%	130 +420%
Valorant	20−22 −625%	140−150 +625%

This is how T1000 Max-Q and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 291% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 307% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 306% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 677% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.49	63.02
Recency	27 May 2019	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	263 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has 426% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 260.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.