Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and Radeon RX 7800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070 Ti
2021
8 GB GDDR6X, 290 Watt
61.12

RX 7800 XT outperforms RTX 3070 Ti by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3230
Place by popularity9240
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.6768.04
Power efficiency14.4516.46
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 29% better value for money than RTX 3070 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61443840
Core clock speed1575 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)290 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8583.2
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192240
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4860

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth608.3 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti 61.12
RX 7800 XT 63.15
+3.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti 23552
RX 7800 XT 24336
+3.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3070 Ti 49760
RX 7800 XT 65611
+31.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3070 Ti 120454
RX 7800 XT 134322
+11.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3070 Ti 37663
RX 7800 XT 49707
+32%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti 208428
+2.8%
RX 7800 XT 202773

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3070 Ti 822127
+10.2%
RX 7800 XT 745990

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD177
−22%
216
+22%
1440p95
−28.4%
122
+28.4%
4K61
−14.8%
70
+14.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.382.31
1440p6.314.09
4K9.827.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 174
−48.3%
258
+48.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 171
−4.1%
178
+4.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−106%
222
+106%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−2.1%
190−200
+2.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 138
−39.9%
193
+39.9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−2%
150−160
+2%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−0.9%
230−240
+0.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−1.7%
230−240
+1.7%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
−2.8%
250−260
+2.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−0.7%
150−160
+0.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−106%
261
+106%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−67.6%
181
+67.6%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−2.1%
190−200
+2.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
−33.1%
161
+33.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−2%
150−160
+2%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−0.9%
230−240
+0.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−1.7%
230−240
+1.7%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 316
−25.9%
398
+25.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−0.7%
150−160
+0.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 103
−26.2%
130
+26.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−46.3%
158
+46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
−33.3%
148
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+2.7%
222
−2.7%
Hitman 3 120−130
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 243
−12.8%
274
+12.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 274
−24.1%
340
+24.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
−36.1%
200
+36.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
−34.3%
145
+34.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−2.9%
140−150
+2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−2.1%
95−100
+2.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 93
−28%
119
+28%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−65.3%
124
+65.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−2.8%
70−75
+2.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
−32.9%
97
+32.9%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−2.8%
70−75
+2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 85−90
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 184
−17.9%
217
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 135
−9.6%
148
+9.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
−18.5%
243
+18.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−40%
147
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
−0.9%
230−240
+0.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−1%
100−110
+1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−2.8%
70−75
+2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−3.4%
60−65
+3.4%
Hitman 3 50−55
−3.8%
50−55
+3.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−0.5%
220−230
+0.5%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−3.3%
90−95
+3.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
−8.3%
118
+8.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
−53.4%
89
+53.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−56.5%
72
+56.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−22.2%
44
+22.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−2.4%
40−45
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−69.1%
164
+69.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
−9.2%
130
+9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
−45.7%
67
+45.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−3.2%
60−65
+3.2%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 22% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 28% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 15% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 3% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 106% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 7800 XT is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 61.12 63.15
Recency 31 May 2021 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 290 Watt 263 Watt

RX 7800 XT has a 3.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 10.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and Radeon RX 7800 XT.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6099 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2942 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.