Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro P500

Place in the ranking	683	202
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.11	53.47
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP108	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	5 January 2018 (6 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	2048
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1518 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	1,800 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.29	129.6
Floating-point processing power	0.7772 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	16	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P500 4.23

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.30
+545%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P500 3022

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+570%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P500 2255

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+527%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−500%

120−130
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
−543%

45−50

+543%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry 5	15 −533%	95−100 +533%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Hitman 3	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −543%	180−190 +543%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −528%	270−280 +528%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry 5	14 −543%	90−95 +543%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Hitman 3	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −543%	180−190 +543%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −528%	270−280 +528%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −543%	45−50 +543%
Far Cry 5	8 −525%	50−55 +525%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Hitman 3	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −543%	180−190 +543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8 −525%	50−55 +525%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −528%	270−280 +528%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−536%

70−75
+536%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Hitman 3	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −515%	160−170 +515%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−525%

50−55

+525%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −500%	18−20 +500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−500%

30−33

+500%

This is how Quadro P500 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 500% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.23	27.30
Recency	5 January 2018	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	35 Watt

Quadro P500 has 94.4% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 545.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P500 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.