GeForce GT 710 vs Quadro M1000M

Place in the ranking	530	952
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.76	0.04
Power efficiency	12.81	5.94
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	GM107	GK208
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)	27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M1000M has 9300% better value for money than GT 710.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	192
Core clock speed	993 MHz	954 MHz
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	95 °C
Texture fill rate	31.78	15.26
Floating-point processing power	1.017 TFLOPS	0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Height	no data	2.713" (6.9 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor support	no data	3 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Display Port	1.2	no data
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision	-	+
PureVideo	-	+
PhysX	-	+
Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.40
+354%

GT 710 1.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2853
+355%

GT 710 627

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498
+269%

GT 710 947

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M1000M 23422
+222%

GT 710 7270

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M1000M 8498
+336%

GT 710 1948

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

M1000M 7959
+309%

GT 710 1946

GeekBench 5 CUDA

M1000M 8471
+458%

GT 710 1519

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

M1000M 24
+300%

GT 710 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39 +388%	8 −388%
1440p	18−20 +350%	4 −350%
4K	13 +85.7%	7 −85.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.15	4.37
1440p	11.16	8.75
4K	15.45	5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+200%

4−5

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +61.8%	30−35 −61.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +450%	4−5 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +567%	3−4 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +400%	5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +417%	12−14 −417%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +61.8%	30−35 −61.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Hitman 3	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +400%	5 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 +267%	3 −267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +61.8%	30−35 −61.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20−22
+567%

3−4

−567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +20%	5 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +488%	8−9 −488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+225%

4−5

−225%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	4−5	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7 +600%	1−2 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −150%	5 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+133%

3−4

−133%

This is how M1000M and GT 710 compete in popular games:

M1000M is 388% faster in 1080p
M1000M is 350% faster in 1440p
M1000M is 86% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the M1000M is 880% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 710 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games: