Quadro M1000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro M1000M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 7.40% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro M1000M sales 18 August 2015 at a recommended price of $200.89 . This is a Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB/4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 40 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro M1000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking531
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.00
Power efficiency12.90of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM107
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200.89 of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

Quadro M1000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M1000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed993 MHzof 2610 MHz (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1072 MHzof 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors1,870 millionof 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)40 Wattof 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate31.78of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power1.017 TFLOPSof 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs16of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs32of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro M1000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M1000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB/4 GBof 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1253 MHzof 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sof 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M1000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs
Display Port1.2

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M1000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+
3D Vision Pro+
Mosaic+
nView Display Management+
Optimus+

API compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro M1000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan+
CUDA5.0

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro M1000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2853

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M1000M 23422

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M1000M 8502

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

M1000M 7959

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

M1000M 8471

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

M1000M 45

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

M1000M 24

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M1000M 59

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M1000M 37

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M1000M 34

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

M1000M 12

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M1000M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M1000M 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

M1000M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

M1000M 37

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

M1000M 59

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

M1000M 34

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

M1000M 12

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

M1000M 1.7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M1000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
4K13

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.15
4K15.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
Battlefield 5 21−24
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 16−18
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
Hitman 3 14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
Metro Exodus 21−24
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
Battlefield 5 21−24
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 16−18
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
Hitman 3 14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
Metro Exodus 21−24
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
Hitman 3 14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
Far Cry 5 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
Hitman 3 10−12
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
Metro Exodus 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Hitman 3 4−5
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8

Closest competitors

Quadro M1000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.


Quadro M1000M 100
Quadro M620 97.57

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro M1000M is Radeon Pro 450, which is slower by 5% and lower by 19 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M1000M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro M1000M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Quadro M1000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.6 540 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro M1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.