NVIDIA started Quadro M1000M sales 18 August 2015 at a recommended price of $200.89 . This is a Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB/4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.25 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 40 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro M1000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking	543
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.19
Power efficiency	12.70	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89	of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Quadro M1000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M1000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed	993 MHz	of 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz	of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	1,870 million	of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	31.78	of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power	1.017 TFLOPS	of 104.8 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs	16	of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs	32	of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro M1000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M1000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB/4 GB	of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M1000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors	No outputs
Display Port	1.2

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M1000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
Optimus	+

API and SDK compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro M1000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 5090)
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	+
CUDA	5.0

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro M1000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M1000M 7.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M1000M 2842

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M1000M 4230

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M1000M 3498

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M1000M 23422

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M1000M 8568

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

M1000M 7972

GeekBench 5 CUDA

M1000M 8471

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

M1000M 45

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

M1000M 24

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M1000M 59

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M1000M 37

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M1000M 34

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

M1000M 12

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M1000M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M1000M 2

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

M1000M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

M1000M 37

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

M1000M 59

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

M1000M 31

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

M1000M 34

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

M1000M 12

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

M1000M 1.7

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M1000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD	39
4K	16

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.15
4K	12.56

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27
Counter-Strike 2	16−18
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Forza Horizon 4	30−33
Forza Horizon 5	16−18
Metro Exodus	18−20
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24
Valorant	24−27

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27
Counter-Strike 2	16−18
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Dota 2	24−27
Far Cry 5	30−35
Fortnite	40−45
Forza Horizon 4	30−33
Forza Horizon 5	16−18
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27
Metro Exodus	18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24
Valorant	24−27
World of Tanks	110−120

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27
Counter-Strike 2	16−18
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Dota 2	24−27
Far Cry 5	30−35
Forza Horizon 4	30−33
Forza Horizon 5	16−18
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65
Valorant	24−27

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7
World of Tanks	50−55

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7
Far Cry 5	14−16
Forza Horizon 4	14−16
Forza Horizon 5	10−12
Metro Exodus	10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11
Valorant	18−20

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2
Dota 2	18−20
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20
Metro Exodus	2−3
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7
Counter-Strike 2	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3
Dota 2	18−20
Far Cry 5	9−10
Fortnite	7−8
Forza Horizon 4	8−9
Forza Horizon 5	5−6
Valorant	7−8

Closest competitors

Quadro M1000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.

FirePro W7170M 111.28

Radeon Pro 555 110.58

Radeon Pro 455 109.59

Quadro M1000M 100

Quadro K5000M 98.73

Quadro M620 97.6

Quadro K4100M 97.18

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro M1000M is Radeon Pro 450, which is slower by 4% and lower by 17 positions in our ranking.