Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.93

T1000 Max-Q outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425312
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.19
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96896
Core clock speedno data765 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.419 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−67.6%
55−60
+67.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−64%
40−45
+64%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−48.3%
85−90
+48.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−67.6%
55−60
+67.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−64%
40−45
+64%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−48.3%
85−90
+48.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−62.9%
55−60
+62.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−64%
40−45
+64%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−54.9%
110−120
+54.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−91.8%
90−95
+91.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−85.4%
85−90
+85.4%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 113% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.93 17.35
Recency 15 August 2020 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 58.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
R5 M230 Radeon R5 M230
vs
GT 610 OEM GeForce GT 610 OEM
R5 M230 Radeon R5 M230
vs
GT 630 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GTX 680 GeForce GTX 680
vs
ATI HD 3100 Radeon HD 3100
GV100 GV100
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
UHD Graphics 910 UHD Graphics 910
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
HD 6790 Radeon HD 6790
HD 6350 Radeon HD 6350
vs
7800 GTX GeForce 7800 GTX
HD 6350 Radeon HD 6350
vs
ATI HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 2400 XT
Whiskey Lake GT2 Whiskey Lake GT2
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
vs
A10G A10G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 2470 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.