Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4080 Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
65.19

PRO W7900 outperforms RTX 4080 Mobile by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.79
Power efficiency40.6317.61
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74246144
Core clock speed1290 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate386.3958.1
Floating-point processing power24.72 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs80192
TMUs232384
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores5896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 Mobile 65.19
PRO W7900 75.79
+16.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4080 Mobile 25121
PRO W7900 29204
+16.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD157
−14.6%
180−190
+14.6%
1440p104
−15.4%
120−130
+15.4%
4K70
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data22.22
1440pno data33.33
4Kno data49.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 149
−14.1%
170−180
+14.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−12.4%
190−200
+12.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
−11.9%
160−170
+11.9%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−14.7%
250−260
+14.7%
Hitman 3 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−11.7%
230−240
+11.7%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−14.1%
170−180
+14.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210
−15.4%
240−250
+15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−11.1%
160−170
+11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−12.4%
190−200
+12.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−9.4%
140−150
+9.4%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−14.7%
250−260
+14.7%
Hitman 3 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−11.7%
230−240
+11.7%
Metro Exodus 140−150
−14.1%
170−180
+14.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 351
−14%
400−450
+14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−11.1%
160−170
+11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−8.1%
120−130
+8.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
−10.2%
130−140
+10.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
−15.7%
140−150
+15.7%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
−14.7%
250−260
+14.7%
Hitman 3 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
−11.7%
230−240
+11.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 318
−10.1%
350−400
+10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 172
−10.5%
190−200
+10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−9.1%
120−130
+9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
−8.3%
65−70
+8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 93
−7.5%
100−105
+7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−11.1%
70−75
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
−15.9%
95−100
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
−13.6%
300−310
+13.6%
Hitman 3 70−75
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Metro Exodus 95−100
−15.8%
110−120
+15.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 237
−13.9%
270−280
+13.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
−14.3%
160−170
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
−12.1%
250−260
+12.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Hitman 3 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 211
−13.7%
240−250
+13.7%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−13.3%
85−90
+13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
−11.1%
130−140
+11.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−13.9%
90−95
+13.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
−15.7%
140−150
+15.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

This is how RTX 4080 Mobile and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 15% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 65.19 75.79
Recency 3 January 2023 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 168.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 16.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 628 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.