Radeon PRO W7600 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	27	130
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	73.52
Power efficiency	40.98	19.61
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD104	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	3 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	7424	2048
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2440 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	386.3	312.3
Floating-point processing power	24.72 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	80	64
TMUs	232	128
Tensor Cores	232	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	58	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4080 Mobile 65.49
+76.8%

PRO W7600 37.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4080 Mobile 25176
+76.8%

PRO W7600 14240

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	155 +82.4%	85−90 −82.4%
1440p	102 +85.5%	55−60 −85.5%
4K	68 +94.3%	35−40 −94.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	7.05
1440p	no data	10.89
4K	no data	17.11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	191 +91%	100−105 −91%
Cyberpunk 2077	149 +86.3%	80−85 −86.3%
Elden Ring	250−260 +78.6%	140−150 −78.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	135 +80%	75−80 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%
Forza Horizon 4	383 +82.4%	210−220 −82.4%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +80%	75−80 −80%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +83.1%	65−70 −83.1%
Valorant	300−350 +84.1%	170−180 −84.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	127 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +77.1%	35−40 −77.1%
Dota 2	164 +82.2%	90−95 −82.2%
Elden Ring	257 +83.6%	140−150 −83.6%
Far Cry 5	127 +81.4%	70−75 −81.4%
Fortnite	250−260 +82.9%	140−150 −82.9%
Forza Horizon 4	351 +84.7%	190−200 −84.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	157 +84.7%	85−90 −84.7%
Metro Exodus	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +79.2%	120−130 −79.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +83.1%	65−70 −83.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +83.2%	95−100 −83.2%
Valorant	300−350 +84.1%	170−180 −84.1%
World of Tanks	270−280 +86%	150−160 −86%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +80%	65−70 −80%
Counter-Strike 2	113 +88.3%	60−65 −88.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +103%	30−33 −103%
Dota 2	165 +83.3%	90−95 −83.3%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +80%	70−75 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	323 +79.4%	180−190 −79.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +79.2%	120−130 −79.2%
Valorant	300−350 +84.1%	170−180 −84.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	122 +87.7%	65−70 −87.7%
Elden Ring	172 +81.1%	95−100 −81.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	122 +87.7%	65−70 −87.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +84.2%	95−100 −84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +80%	45−50 −80%
World of Tanks	400−450 +78.8%	250−260 −78.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +93.3%	45−50 −93.3%
Counter-Strike 2	78 +95%	40−45 −95%
Cyberpunk 2077	41 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +77.8%	90−95 −77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	237 +82.3%	130−140 −82.3%
Metro Exodus	120−130 +87.7%	65−70 −87.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140 +86.7%	75−80 −86.7%
Valorant	270−280 +81.3%	150−160 −81.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	53 +96.3%	27−30 −96.3%
Dota 2	144 +80%	80−85 −80%
Elden Ring	88 +95.6%	45−50 −95.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	144 +80%	80−85 −80%
Metro Exodus	67 +91.4%	35−40 −91.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +90%	110−120 −90%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +80%	30−33 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	144 +80%	80−85 −80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +86.7%	45−50 −86.7%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +97.5%	40−45 −97.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Dota 2	157 +84.7%	85−90 −84.7%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +90.9%	55−60 −90.9%
Fortnite	95−100 +92%	50−55 −92%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +87.7%	65−70 −87.7%
Valorant	150−160 +82.4%	85−90 −82.4%

This is how RTX 4080 Mobile and PRO W7600 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 Mobile is 82% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 85% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 94% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.49	37.04
Recency	3 January 2023	3 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	130 Watt

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.