Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs T1200 Mobile

VS
M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.23
+47.2%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

T1200 Mobile T1200
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking284388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.60no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed855 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+114%
28
−114%
1440p32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
4K90
+50%
60−65
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+41.1%
55−60
−41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Far Cry 5 65
+47.7%
40−45
−47.7%
Fortnite 100−105
+35.1%
70−75
−35.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+42.6%
50−55
−42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+47.1%
30−35
−47.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
Valorant 140−150
+27.9%
110−120
−27.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+41.1%
55−60
−41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+27.8%
180−190
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Dota 2 114
+34.1%
85−90
−34.1%
Far Cry 5 59
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Fortnite 100−105
+35.1%
70−75
−35.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+42.6%
50−55
−42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+55.9%
30−35
−55.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+44.9%
45−50
−44.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+109%
30−35
−109%
Valorant 140−150
+27.9%
110−120
−27.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+41.1%
55−60
−41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Dota 2 107
+25.9%
85−90
−25.9%
Far Cry 5 56
+27.3%
40−45
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+42.6%
50−55
−42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+17.6%
30−35
−17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+56.5%
45−50
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Valorant 140−150
+27.9%
110−120
−27.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+35.1%
70−75
−35.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+41.2%
95−100
−41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+85%
20−22
−85%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+61.3%
100−110
−61.3%
Valorant 170−180
+30.7%
130−140
−30.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 41
+46.4%
27−30
−46.4%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+54.8%
30−35
−54.8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+47.8%
21−24
−47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+55%
20−22
−55%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Valorant 100−110
+55.1%
65−70
−55.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Dota 2 109
+137%
45−50
−137%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+50%
21−24
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 114% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 52% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 137% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, T1200 Mobile surpassed Apple M1 8-Core GPU in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.23 13.74
Recency 12 April 2021 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 47.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Mobile
RX 590 GME 590 GME
vs
RX 7600 7600
RX 7600 7600
vs
RTX 2080 Super Mobile 2080 Super Mobile
Playstation 5 GPU AMD 5 GPU
vs
RX 7600 7600
RTX 5000 NVIDIA RTX 5000
vs
RX 7600 7600
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
vs
RX 7600 7600
P5000 X2 Mobile NVIDIA P5000 X2 Mobile
vs
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q 2050 Max-Q
PRO W7900 AMD PRO W7900
vs
RTX 4080 Mobile 4080 Mobile
RX 7700S 7700S
vs
RX 7950 XTX 7950 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T1200 Mobile or M1 8-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.