Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Apple M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
20.20
+39.4%

T1200 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking272360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.58no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed855 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed10000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+103%
29
−103%
1440p34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
4K109
+45.3%
75−80
−45.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+104%
21−24
−104%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+39.4%
30−35
−39.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.7%
90−95
−33.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+33.3%
70−75
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+46.8%
45−50
−46.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+43.5%
45−50
−43.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+19.7%
75−80
−19.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+41.3%
45−50
−41.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+39.4%
30−35
−39.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.7%
90−95
−33.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+33.3%
70−75
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+46.8%
45−50
−46.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+58.7%
45−50
−58.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+19.7%
75−80
−19.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+37.5%
30−35
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−9.5%
21−24
+9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+39.4%
30−35
−39.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+33.7%
90−95
−33.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 63
−14.3%
70−75
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+37%
45−50
−37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
−300%
75−80
+300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+54.2%
70−75
−54.2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+35.6%
85−90
−35.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hitman 3 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+69.2%
12−14
−69.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 103% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 42% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 45% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 104% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.20 14.49
Recency 12 April 2021 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

T1200 Mobile has a 39.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU, on the other hand, has a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 922 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.