Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.30
+141%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.76
Power efficiency10.649.46
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107BLexa
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed1354 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.7239.01
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+143%
30−35
−143%
Full HD46
+156%
18−20
−156%
1440p24
+167%
9−10
−167%
4K15
+150%
6−7
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.28
1440pno data16.56
4Kno data24.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+264%
14−16
−264%
Far Cry 5 39
+144%
16−18
−144%
Fortnite 132
+164%
50−55
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+162%
21−24
−162%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+80%
14−16
−80%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+214%
14−16
−214%
Dota 2 126
+688%
16−18
−688%
Far Cry 5 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Fortnite 51
+82.1%
27−30
−82.1%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+148%
21−24
−148%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Metro Exodus 19
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
40−45
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+144%
16−18
−144%
World of Tanks 160−170
+104%
75−80
−104%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Dota 2 115
+619%
16−18
−619%
Far Cry 5 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
−41.4%
40−45
+41.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+144%
9−10
−144%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+144%
16−18
−144%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Metro Exodus 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+271%
7−8
−271%
Far Cry 5 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+271%
7−8
−271%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+150%
10−11
−150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Dota 2 34
+100%
16−18
−100%
Far Cry 5 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+200%
4−5
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
World of Tanks 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 143% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 156% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 167% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 688% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the PRO WX 2100 is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
  • PRO WX 2100 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.30 4.69
Recency 3 January 2017 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 140.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 95.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
K2200M K2200M
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX150 MX150
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Pro 560 Pro 560
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Pro 555 Pro 555
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX130 MX130
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
GeForce MX110 MX110
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 1309 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.