Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	353	317
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.99	24.10
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (8 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	896
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	765 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	75.60
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
1440p	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
4K	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +5.4%	55−60 −5.4%
Far Cry 5	47 −6.4%	50−55 +6.4%
Fortnite	85−90 −11.8%	95−100 +11.8%
Forza Horizon 4	62 −17.7%	70−75 +17.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −24.2%	40−45 +24.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	49 −14.3%	55−60 +14.3%
Dota 2	92 +46%	60−65 −46%
Far Cry 5	44 −38.6%	60−65 +38.6%
Fortnite	76 −25%	95−100 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	57 −28.1%	70−75 +28.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	55 −12.7%	60−65 +12.7%
Metro Exodus	19 −153%	45−50 +153%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	52 −135%	120−130 +135%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −10.8%	40−45 +10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 −14.9%	50−55 +14.9%
World of Tanks	190−200 −9.2%	210−220 +9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 −33.3%	55−60 +33.3%
Dota 2	86 +36.5%	60−65 −36.5%
Far Cry 5	40 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −69.8%	70−75 +69.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	39 −213%	120−130 +213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−11.1%

60−65
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Metro Exodus	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
Far Cry 5	26 −73.1%	45−50 +73.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −15.8%	40−45 +15.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−9.4%

35−40
+9.4%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	7 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Dota 2	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	12 −83.3%	21−24 +83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −18.2%	24−27 +18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

9
−11.1%

10−11

+11.1%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Valorant	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
World of Tanks	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Fortnite	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 7% faster in 1080p
T1000 Max-Q is 8% faster in 1440p
T1000 Max-Q is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 46% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 213% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 29 tests (46%)
there's a draw in 31 test (49%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.55	16.71
Recency	3 January 2017	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt

T1000 Max-Q has a 14.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.