Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce MX350

Place in the ranking	539	316
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.20	24.08
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 February 2020 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	896
Core clock speed	747 MHz	765 MHz
Boost clock speed	937 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.98	75.60
Floating-point processing power	1.199 TFLOPS	2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	32	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	56.06 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.32

T1000 Max-Q 17.49
+139%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2814

T1000 Max-Q 6724
+139%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27 −122%	60−65 +122%
1440p	31 −126%	70−75 +126%
4K	26 −131%	60−65 +131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14 −121%	30−35 +121%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Elden Ring	20 −175%	55−60 +175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27 −107%	55−60 +107%
Counter-Strike 2	11 −182%	30−35 +182%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −600%	35−40 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	32 −125%	70−75 +125%
Metro Exodus	28 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 −28.1%	40−45 +28.1%
Valorant	24−27 −192%	70−75 +192%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −143%	55−60 +143%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −775%	35−40 +775%
Dota 2	51 −21.6%	60−65 +21.6%
Elden Ring	13 −323%	55−60 +323%
Far Cry 5	50 −22%	60−65 +22%
Fortnite	40−45 −121%	95−100 +121%
Forza Horizon 4	25 −188%	70−75 +188%
Grand Theft Auto V	35 −77.1%	60−65 +77.1%
Metro Exodus	17 −176%	45−50 +176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85 −43.5%	120−130 +43.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −95.2%	40−45 +95.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −135%	50−55 +135%
Valorant	21 −233%	70−75 +233%
World of Tanks	120 −78.3%	210−220 +78.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	17 −229%	55−60 +229%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Cyberpunk 2077	3 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Dota 2	76 +22.6%	60−65 −22.6%
Far Cry 5	40 −52.5%	60−65 +52.5%
Forza Horizon 4	19 −279%	70−75 +279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −107%	120−130 +107%
Valorant	24−27 −192%	70−75 +192%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Elden Ring	9−10 −211%	27−30 +211%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −313%	160−170 +313%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
World of Tanks	50−55 −126%	120−130 +126%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −177%	35−40 +177%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −200%	45−50 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −214%	40−45 +214%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −255%	35−40 +255%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Valorant	18−20 −132%	40−45 +132%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Dota 2	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Elden Ring	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	30 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Fortnite	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Valorant	7−8 −186%	20−22 +186%

This is how GeForce MX350 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T1000 Max-Q is 122% faster in 1080p
T1000 Max-Q is 126% faster in 1440p
T1000 Max-Q is 131% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 23% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX350 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.32	17.49
Recency	10 February 2020	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	50 Watt

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 8 months, and 150% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 138.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.