Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	353	330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.99	23.16
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (8 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.488 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
1440p	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
4K	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Far Cry 5	47 −6.4%	50−55 +6.4%
Fortnite	85−90 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
Forza Horizon 4	62 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	56 −7.1%	60−65 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 −6.1%	35−40 +6.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	49 −2%	50−55 +2%
Dota 2	92 −8.7%	100−105 +8.7%
Far Cry 5	44 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
Fortnite	76 −5.3%	80−85 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	57 −5.3%	60−65 +5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	55 −9.1%	60−65 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	19 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	52 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 −6.4%	50−55 +6.4%
World of Tanks	190−200 −7.1%	210−220 +7.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Dota 2	86 −4.7%	90−95 +4.7%
Far Cry 5	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	39 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−1.9%

55−60
+1.9%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Metro Exodus	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Far Cry 5	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

−9.4%

35−40
+9.4%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

+0%

9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

Quadro T1000 is 7% faster in 1080p
Quadro T1000 is 8% faster in 1440p
Quadro T1000 is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.55	16.06
Recency	3 January 2017	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 10.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.