Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc A750

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

Arc A750
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.74
+170%

Arc A750 outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking179412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.35no data
Power efficiency9.71no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe² (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-512Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35847
Core clock speed2050 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate537.6no data
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs112no data
TMUs224no data
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0no data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 31.74
+170%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A750 12202
+170%
Arc Graphics 130V 4512

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A750 37288
+292%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A750 29667
+259%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD109
+241%
32
−241%
1440p59
+181%
21−24
−181%
4K36
+200%
12−14
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.65no data
1440p4.90no data
4K8.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+122%
41
−122%
Elden Ring 84
+147%
30−35
−147%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+139%
35−40
−139%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+184%
31
−184%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+301%
71
−301%
Metro Exodus 116
+263%
30−35
−263%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Valorant 120−130
+182%
45−50
−182%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+139%
35−40
−139%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+171%
28
−171%
Dota 2 99
+141%
41
−141%
Elden Ring 100−110
+218%
30−35
−218%
Far Cry 5 68
+143%
28
−143%
Fortnite 140−150
+121%
65−70
−121%
Forza Horizon 4 239
+312%
58
−312%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+136%
40−45
−136%
Metro Exodus 94
+194%
30−35
−194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+106%
85−90
−106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+209%
35−40
−209%
Valorant 120−130
+182%
45−50
−182%
World of Tanks 270−280
+70.4%
160−170
−70.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+139%
35−40
−139%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+200%
25
−200%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+91.3%
45−50
−91.3%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+315%
48
−315%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+106%
85−90
−106%
Valorant 120−130
+182%
45−50
−182%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 41
+173%
14−16
−173%
Elden Ring 60−65
+253%
16−18
−253%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+192%
60−65
−192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
World of Tanks 200−210
+146%
80−85
−146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+170%
21−24
−170%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+391%
10−12
−391%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+281%
24−27
−281%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+437%
27−30
−437%
Metro Exodus 86
+258%
24−27
−258%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
Valorant 90−95
+217%
27−30
−217%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20
+233%
6−7
−233%
Dota 2 45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Elden Ring 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Metro Exodus 43
+514%
7−8
−514%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+194%
30−35
−194%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+150%
8−9
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+105%
21−24
−105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+214%
14−16
−214%
Fortnite 40−45
+223%
12−14
−223%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+460%
14−16
−460%
Valorant 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%

This is how Arc A750 and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 241% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 181% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A750 is 514% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A750 surpassed Arc Graphics 130V in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.74 11.74
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm

Arc A750 has a 170.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A750 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 869 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.