Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc A580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A580 with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

Arc A580
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
30.42
+160%

Arc A580 outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking182408
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Power efficiency11.99no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 October 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30727
Core clock speed1700 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2000 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate384.0no data
Floating-point processing power12.29 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
Tensor Cores384no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0no data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A580 30.42
+160%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A580 11727
+160%
Arc Graphics 130V 4519

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A580 35210
+270%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A580 27574
+234%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+232%
31
−232%
1440p54
+200%
18−21
−200%
4K32
+167%
12−14
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 103
+194%
35−40
−194%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85
+183%
30−33
−183%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+166%
50−55
−166%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+191%
35−40
−191%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+163%
75−80
−163%
Hitman 3 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+163%
65−70
−163%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+162%
50−55
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+180%
55−60
−180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 102
+191%
35−40
−191%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+170%
27−30
−170%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+166%
50−55
−166%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+191%
35−40
−191%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+163%
75−80
−163%
Hitman 3 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+163%
65−70
−163%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+162%
50−55
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 214
+168%
80−85
−168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+187%
30−33
−187%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+167%
24−27
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+167%
24−27
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+180%
30−33
−180%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Forza Horizon 4 87
+190%
30−33
−190%
Hitman 3 85−90
+197%
30−33
−197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 109
+173%
40−45
−173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 177
+172%
65−70
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+183%
24−27
−183%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+186%
21−24
−186%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+171%
35−40
−171%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+200%
18−20
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+183%
18−20
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+171%
85−90
−171%
Hitman 3 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+190%
30−33
−190%
Metro Exodus 91
+160%
35−40
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+160%
50−55
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+162%
21−24
−162%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+164%
75−80
−164%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%
Hitman 3 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+169%
70−75
−169%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+200%
18−20
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+190%
21−24
−190%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+192%
12−14
−192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+167%
21−24
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+170%
27−30
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27
+170%
10−11
−170%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%

This is how Arc A580 and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 232% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 200% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 167% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.42 11.72
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm

Arc A580 has a 159.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A580 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A580
Arc A580
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 269 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.