Arc Graphics 130V vs Radeon RX 7800 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 7800 XT with Arc Graphics 130V, including specs and performance data.

RX 7800 XT
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
63.20
+439%

RX 7800 XT outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a whopping 439% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30408
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation68.03no data
Power efficiency16.58no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameNavi 32Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38407
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2430 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors28,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)263 Wattno data
Texture fill rate583.2no data
Floating-point processing power37.32 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2438 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth624.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1no data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7800 XT 63.20
+439%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7800 XT 24359
+439%
Arc Graphics 130V 4519

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7800 XT 65611
+589%
Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7800 XT 49707
+502%
Arc Graphics 130V 8255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD216
+597%
31
−597%
1440p122
+481%
21−24
−481%
4K70
+483%
12−14
−483%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.31no data
1440p4.09no data
4K7.13no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 258
+473%
45−50
−473%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 178
+493%
30−33
−493%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 222
+455%
40−45
−455%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+469%
35−40
−469%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 193
+451%
35−40
−451%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+528%
18−20
−528%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+459%
27−30
−459%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+475%
40−45
−475%
Hitman 3 120−130
+490%
21−24
−490%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+483%
40−45
−483%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+474%
27−30
−474%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 250−260
+469%
45−50
−469%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+456%
27−30
−456%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 261
+480%
45−50
−480%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 181
+503%
30−33
−503%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+469%
35−40
−469%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 161
+496%
27−30
−496%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+528%
18−20
−528%
Far Cry New Dawn 150−160
+459%
27−30
−459%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+475%
40−45
−475%
Hitman 3 120−130
+490%
21−24
−490%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230−240
+483%
40−45
−483%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+474%
27−30
−474%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 398
+469%
70−75
−469%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+450%
24−27
−450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+456%
27−30
−456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130
+442%
24−27
−442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 158
+485%
27−30
−485%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+448%
27−30
−448%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+528%
18−20
−528%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+455%
40−45
−455%
Hitman 3 120−130
+490%
21−24
−490%
Horizon Zero Dawn 274
+448%
50−55
−448%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 340
+467%
60−65
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+471%
35−40
−471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 145
+504%
24−27
−504%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+483%
24−27
−483%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+444%
18−20
−444%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 119
+467%
21−24
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 124
+490%
21−24
−490%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+517%
12−14
−517%
Cyberpunk 2077 97
+506%
16−18
−506%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+442%
50−55
−442%
Hitman 3 90−95
+463%
16−18
−463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 217
+443%
40−45
−443%
Metro Exodus 148
+448%
27−30
−448%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 243
+440%
45−50
−440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+444%
27−30
−444%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+488%
40−45
−488%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+483%
18−20
−483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+508%
12−14
−508%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+510%
10−11
−510%
Hitman 3 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+458%
40−45
−458%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+488%
16−18
−488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+462%
21−24
−462%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89
+456%
16−18
−456%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+500%
12−14
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+463%
8−9
−463%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+450%
8−9
−450%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%
Forza Horizon 4 164
+447%
30−33
−447%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130
+442%
24−27
−442%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
+458%
12−14
−458%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+540%
10−11
−540%

This is how RX 7800 XT and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 597% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 481% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 483% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 63.20 11.72
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 439.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2894 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.