GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs Arc A550M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A550M with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Arc A550M
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.51

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms Arc A550M by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2255
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.29
Power efficiency28.0119.05
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512AD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2022 (2 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204810240
Core clock speed900 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2550 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate262.4816.0
Floating-point processing power8.397 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs128320
Tensor Cores256320
Ray Tracing Cores1680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A550M 24.51
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.93
+263%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A550M 14350
RTX 4080 SUPER 59075
+312%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−273%
261
+273%
1440p45−50
−302%
181
+302%
4K30−35
−290%
117
+290%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.83
1440pno data5.52
4Kno data8.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−352%
235
+352%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−585%
281
+585%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−213%
240−250
+213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−115%
110−120
+115%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−219%
200−210
+219%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−87.2%
260−270
+87.2%
Hitman 3 45−50
−169%
120−130
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−181%
300−350
+181%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−89%
150−160
+89%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−396%
350−400
+396%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−52.5%
150−160
+52.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−558%
342
+558%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−478%
237
+478%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−213%
240−250
+213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−115%
110−120
+115%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
−219%
200−210
+219%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−87.2%
260−270
+87.2%
Hitman 3 45−50
−169%
120−130
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−181%
300−350
+181%
Metro Exodus 80−85
−89%
150−160
+89%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−610%
568
+610%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−290%
200−210
+290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−52.5%
150−160
+52.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−204%
158
+204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−410%
209
+410%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
−145%
120−130
+145%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−259%
140−150
+259%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−115%
110−120
+115%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−128%
322
+128%
Hitman 3 45−50
−169%
120−130
+169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−283%
425
+283%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−559%
527
+559%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−406%
263
+406%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−43.6%
145
+43.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−100%
120−130
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−269%
160−170
+269%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−211%
110−120
+211%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−440%
135
+440%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−617%
165
+617%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−204%
80−85
+204%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−200%
80−85
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−99.3%
270−280
+99.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
−361%
120−130
+361%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−604%
345
+604%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−280%
171
+280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−678%
397
+678%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−662%
221
+662%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
−76.5%
240−250
+76.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−223%
120−130
+223%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−283%
85−90
+283%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−283%
65−70
+283%
Hitman 3 18−20
−337%
80−85
+337%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+44.7%
85
−44.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−426%
140−150
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−685%
204
+685%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−586%
96
+586%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−662%
99
+662%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−300%
50−55
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−824%
305
+824%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−593%
201
+593%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−636%
81
+636%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−429%
110−120
+429%

This is how Arc A550M and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 273% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 302% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 290% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 45% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 824% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A550M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 65 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.51 88.93
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 320 Watt

Arc A550M has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 262.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A550M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 77 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1990 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.