Arc A550M vs GeForce RTX 4060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4060
2023
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
51.51
+110%

RTX 4060 outperforms Arc A550M by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51225
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency30.7128.01
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD107DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722048
Core clock speed1830 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2460 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate236.2262.4
Floating-point processing power15.11 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs96128
Tensor Cores96256
Ray Tracing Cores2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2125 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth272.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4060 51.51
+110%
Arc A550M 24.51

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4060 28111
+95.9%
Arc A550M 14350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD145
+123%
65−70
−123%
1440p77
+120%
35−40
−120%
4K44
+144%
18−21
−144%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.06no data
1440p3.88no data
4K6.80no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 139
+256%
35−40
−256%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+108%
75−80
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+102%
45−50
−102%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+174%
35−40
−174%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+95.2%
60−65
−95.2%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.8%
140−150
−51.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
+125%
45−50
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+79.3%
110−120
−79.3%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+79.3%
80−85
−79.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+72.6%
60−65
−72.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190−200
+146%
80−85
−146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+40.6%
100−110
−40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+108%
75−80
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+102%
45−50
−102%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+131%
35−40
−131%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+95.2%
60−65
−95.2%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.8%
140−150
−51.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
+125%
45−50
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+79.3%
110−120
−79.3%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+79.3%
80−85
−79.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+72.6%
60−65
−72.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 217
+171%
80−85
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+102%
50−55
−102%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+40.6%
100−110
−40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+104%
50−55
−104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+115%
40−45
−115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+102%
45−50
−102%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+105%
35−40
−105%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+85.5%
55−60
−85.5%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+51.8%
140−150
−51.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
+125%
45−50
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+79.3%
110−120
−79.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190
+138%
80−85
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 112
+115%
50−55
−115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+40.6%
100−110
−40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+72.6%
60−65
−72.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+131%
45−50
−131%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+117%
35−40
−117%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+128%
24−27
−128%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+161%
21−24
−161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+220%
14−16
−220%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+91.2%
130−140
−91.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
+150%
27−30
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+139%
45−50
−139%
Metro Exodus 111
+147%
45−50
−147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+153%
50−55
−153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+179%
27−30
−179%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+61%
130−140
−61%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+120%
40−45
−120%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+135%
21−24
−135%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Hitman 3 40−45
+121%
18−20
−121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+69.1%
120−130
−69.1%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+162%
24−27
−162%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+233%
6−7
−233%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+146%
12−14
−146%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+124%
30−35
−124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%

This is how RTX 4060 and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 123% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 is 120% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 is 144% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 4060 is 256% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4060 surpassed Arc A550M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.51 24.51
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 4060 has a 110.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has 91.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 18458 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 77 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.