Arc Graphics 140V vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.74
+2%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking388392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataXe² (2025)
GPU code nameno dataLunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores88
Core clock speed1278 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Shared memory++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12_2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−46.4%
41
+46.4%
1440p21−24
+0%
21
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−96.9%
63
+96.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−95.7%
45
+95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−37.5%
44
+37.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−60.9%
37
+60.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−15.9%
51
+15.9%
Fortnite 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Valorant 110−120
+1.8%
100−110
−1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+6.7%
30
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−30.4%
30
+30.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+1.7%
170−180
−1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Dota 2 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−2.3%
45
+2.3%
Fortnite 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+11.4%
44
−11.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−82.4%
62
+82.4%
Valorant 110−120
+1.8%
100−110
−1.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−8.7%
25
+8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Dota 2 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+4.8%
42
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1.9%
50−55
−1.9%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+21.4%
28
−21.4%
Valorant 110−120
+1.8%
100−110
−1.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+2.1%
95−100
−2.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+7.1%
95−100
−7.1%
Valorant 130−140
+2.2%
130−140
−2.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
30−35
−2.9%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−25%
35
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
−1.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140V is 46% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 25% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 97% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 34 tests (53%)
  • Arc Graphics 140V is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.74 13.47
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 8-Core GPU and Arc Graphics 140V.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
T1000 T1000
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
vs
Arc 7 A730M 7 A730M
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
TITAN Ada TITAN Ada
STG-2000 STG 2000
vs
Steam Deck GPU Deck GPU
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Graphics (Ryzen 9000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 12 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.