GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.53

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking381378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.71
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8768
Core clock speed1278 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data68.02
Floating-point processing powerno data2.177 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1752 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 13.53
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 13.67
+1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 324705
+15.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−107%
56
+107%
1440p18−20
−5.6%
19
+5.6%
4K18−20
−11.1%
20
+11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+9.8%
41
−9.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−28.9%
49
+28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
−44.9%
71
+44.9%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−35.3%
69
+35.3%
Fortnite 75−80
−1.3%
75−80
+1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−16.3%
57
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+11.8%
34
−11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−41%
141
+41%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
World of Tanks 180−190
−0.5%
180−190
+0.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+25%
36
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
−91.8%
94
+91.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−1%
100−110
+1%
Valorant 55−60
−1.8%
55−60
+1.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
World of Tanks 95−100
−1%
95−100
+1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−3%
30−35
+3%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−50%
36
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−50%
36
+50%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+80%
5
−80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−5%
42
+5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−50%
36
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+18.2%
11
−18.2%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−91.7%
46
+91.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 107% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 6% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 80% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 92% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 30 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.53 13.67
Recency 10 November 2020 3 January 2018
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
R9 M380 Mac Edition Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Tesla P100 SXM2 Tesla P100 SXM2
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 926 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.