Celeron 3215U vs Xeon X3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.07
+204%
Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.68

Xeon X3470 outperforms Celeron 3215U by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18912720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.054.27
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.07
+204%
Celeron 3215U 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3470 3269
+202%
Celeron 3215U 1083

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 0.68
Recency 1 July 2009 1 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon X3470 has a 204.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron 3215U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3215U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3215U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Celeron 3215U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 738 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or Celeron 3215U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.