Celeron N6211 vs Pentium M 725

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium MElkhart Lake
Power efficiencyno data20.62
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date23 June 2004 (20 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm10 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium M 725 1400
Celeron N6211 2696
+92.6%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2004 17 July 2022
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 18 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 725 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 725
Pentium M 725
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Pentium M 725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 725 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.