i9-10900E vs EPYC 4244P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4244P
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
17.26
+40.8%
Core i9-10900E
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
12.26

EPYC 4244P outperforms Core i9-10900E by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking364624
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.8112.17
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency25.1317.85
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$488

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4244P has 334% better value for money than i9-10900E.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1220
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size71 mm2206 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors6,570 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM51200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes2816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 4244P 17.26
+40.8%
i9-10900E 12.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 4244P 27415
+40.8%
i9-10900E 19469

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.26 12.26
Integrated graphics card 1.98 3.09
Recency 21 May 2024 30 April 2020
Physical cores 6 10
Threads 12 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

EPYC 4244P has a 40.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

i9-10900E, on the other hand, has 56.1% faster integrated GPU, and 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900E in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10900E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4244P and Core i9-10900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P
Intel Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate EPYC 4244P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Core i9-10900E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 4244P or Core i9-10900E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.