A4 PRO-3340B vs EPYC 4364P
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4364P outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a whopping 2087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 228 | 2434 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 43.82 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 20.50 | 3.94 |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2024) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 20 December 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 71 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 61 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 6,570 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| RAID | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3/DDR3L-1600 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | AMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics |
| iGPU core count | no data | 2 |
| Number of pipelines | no data | 128 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.74 | 1.04 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 20 December 2014 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 25 Watt |
EPYC 4364P has a 2086.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
A4 PRO-3340B, on the other hand, has 320% lower power consumption.
The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the A4 PRO-3340B in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC 4364P is a server/workstation processor while A4 PRO-3340B is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4364P and A4 PRO-3340B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
