i9-10900TE vs EPYC 4124P

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 4124P
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
12.18
+14.7%

EPYC 4124P outperforms Core i9-10900TE by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking657753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.839.73
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency17.0927.67
Architecture codenameRaphael (2023−2024)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149$488

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4124P has 412% better value for money than i9-10900TE.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads820
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size71 mm2206 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)61 °Cno data
Number of transistors6,570 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM51200
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes2816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 4124P 12.18
+14.7%
i9-10900TE 10.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 4124P 18637
+14.7%
i9-10900TE 16251

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.18 10.62
Integrated graphics card 1.98 3.09
Recency 21 May 2024 30 April 2020
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 8 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

EPYC 4124P has a 14.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

i9-10900TE, on the other hand, has 56.1% faster integrated GPU, 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 4124P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 4124P is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10900TE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 4124P and Core i9-10900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 4124P
EPYC 4124P
Intel Core i9-10900TE
Core i9-10900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i9-10900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 4124P or Core i9-10900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.