EPYC 75F3 vs E1-6010

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	51
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.93
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	AMD E-Series	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	no data	14.58
Architecture codename	Beema (2014)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	29 April 2014 (10 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	2	64
Base clock speed	no data	2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.35 GHz	4 GHz
Multiplier	no data	29.5
L1 cache	no data	2 MB
L2 cache	1024 KB	16 MB
L3 cache	no data	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm+
Die size	107 mm2	8x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	90 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	FT3b	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	FMA4	-
AVX	+	+
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	no data	4 TiB
Max memory channels	1	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R2 Graphics	N/A
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	8	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	29 April 2014	12 January 2021
Physical cores	2	32
Threads	2	64
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---