EPYC 75F3 vs E1-7010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated52
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.98
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.58
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data29.5
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFP4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-7010 593
EPYC 75F3 68505
+11452%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-7010 127
EPYC 75F3 1826
+1338%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-7010 218
EPYC 75F3 16432
+7438%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2015 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 280 Watt

E1-7010 has 2700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-7010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-7010 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-7010
E1-7010
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 228 votes

Rate E1-7010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-7010 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.