EPYC 7313P vs E1-6010

VS

Primary details

Comparing E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.90
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data15.98
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$913

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.35 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cache1024 KB8 MB
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die size107 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3bSP3
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 GraphicsN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E1-6010 537
EPYC 7313P 41609
+7648%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

E1-6010 127
EPYC 7313P 1606
+1165%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

E1-6010 220
EPYC 7313P 11060
+4927%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 155 Watt

E1-6010 has 1450% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that E1-6010 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E1-6010 and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E1-6010
E1-6010
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 561 vote

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E1-6010 or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.