Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs E-350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-350
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.26
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.27
+3.8%

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ outperforms E-350 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32033192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD E-SeriesMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency1.380.73
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date4 January 2011 (14 years ago)August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128K
L2 cache512K (per core)512K
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography40 nmno data
Die size75 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1754
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4Ano data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6310no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

E-350 0.26
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 0.27
+3.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-350 425
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440
+3.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.27
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 35 Watt

E-350 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, on the other hand, has a 3.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-350
E-350
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 428 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors E-350 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.