Opteron 3380 vs E-450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E-450
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.48
Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.74
+471%

Opteron 3380 outperforms E-450 by a whopping 471% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E-450 and Opteron 3380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29101702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.523.99
Architecture codenameZacate (2011−2013)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date22 August 2011 (13 years ago)4 December 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E-450 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.65 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size75 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E-450 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-Vno data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3 Single-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6320no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E-450 0.48
Opteron 3380 2.74
+471%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E-450 765
Opteron 3380 4358
+470%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 2.74
Recency 22 August 2011 4 December 2012
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

E-450 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

Opteron 3380, on the other hand, has a 470.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Opteron 3380 is our recommended choice as it beats the E-450 in performance tests.

Be aware that E-450 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Opteron 3380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E-450
E-450
AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 541 vote

Rate E-450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E-450 or Opteron 3380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.