Opteron 3380 vs E-450
Primary details
Comparing E-450 and Opteron 3380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1713 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD E-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.79 |
| Architecture codename | Zacate (2011−2013) | Delhi (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
E-450 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.65 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on E-450 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6320 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E-450 and Opteron 3380.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
E-450 has 261.1% lower power consumption.
Opteron 3380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between E-450 and Opteron 3380. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that E-450 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3380 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between E-450 and Opteron 3380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
