3020e vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data24.13
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956FT5
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 4 August 2020
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 20% lower power consumption.

3020e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.