Turion 64 ML-30 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.16
Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.17
+6.3%

Turion 64 ML-30 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32793271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloTurion 64
Power efficiency2.750.46
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956754
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 0.16
Turion 64 ML-30 0.17
+6.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 564
Turion 64 ML-30 617
+9.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.16 0.17
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

Turion 64 ML-30, on the other hand, has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
vs
Atom E3815 Atom E3815
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
vs
Turion 64 MK-38 Turion 64 MK-38
i7-4712MQ Core i7 4712MQ
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
i3-4000M Core i3 4000M
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
i7-2617M Core i7 2617M
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Pentium J2900 Pentium J2900
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i3-8145U Core i3 8145U

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.