Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs A10-9620P

Place in the ranking	2106	3296
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Bristol Ridge	Intel Core 2 Solo
Power efficiency	10.09	2.75
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)	20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$262

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Core 2 Solo SU3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	4	1
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	1.2 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L2 cache	2 MB	3 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Die size	250 mm²	107 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	3100 Million	410 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Core 2 Solo SU3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP4	BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	5.5 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Solo SU3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3, DDR4

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.60
+900%

Core 2 Solo SU3300 0.16

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-9620P 2277
+82.6%

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-9620P 7420
+495%

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.60	0.16
Recency	1 January 2017	20 August 2008
Physical cores	4	1
Threads	4	1
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	5 Watt

A10-9620P has a 900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Solo SU3300, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The A10-9620P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Core 2 Solo SU3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.