3020e vs Pentium Dual T4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T4400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+88.9%

3020e outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4400 by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25912124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency2.1924.13
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date1 December 2009 (14 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPFT5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T4400 0.81
3020e 1.53
+88.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T4400 1284
3020e 2436
+89.7%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium Dual T4400 38.2
3020e 29
+31.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 1.53
Recency 1 December 2009 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has a 88.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T4400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4400 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Pentium Dual Core T4400
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 214 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 812 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4400 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.