Turion 64 ML-30 vs Core 2 Quad Q9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 Core 2 Duo P8400 Core 2 Duo P8600 Core 2 Duo T6600 Core 2 Duo T8300 Core 2 Duo T9300 Core 2 Duo T9600 Core 2 Duo T9900 Pentium Dual Core T4200 Pentium Dual Core T4300 Pentium Dual Core T4400 Pentium Dual Core T4500
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37

Contents

Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2464not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 QuadTurion 64
Power efficiency2.08no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 2863
+364%
Turion 64 ML-30 617

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 20.25
+443%
Turion 64 ML-30 110

Pros & cons summary

Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q9000 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Turion 64 ML-30, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9000 and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
A8-5545M A8 5545M
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Core 2 Duo T7600G Core 2 Duo T7600G
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
i7-2657M Core i7 2657M
Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-30
vs
i5-10310U Core i5 10310U
i7-4712MQ Core i7 4712MQ
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
i3-4000M Core i3 4000M
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
i7-2617M Core i7 2617M
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Pentium J2900 Pentium J2900
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360
Pentium Dual-Core T4500 Pentium Dual Core T4500
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.9 533 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9000 or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.