Pentium M 715 vs Turion 64 ML-30

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.17
+6.3%
Pentium M 715
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.16

Turion 64 ML-30 outperforms Pentium M 715 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32713286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Pentium M
Power efficiency0.460.72
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)23 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size125 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-30 0.17
+6.3%
Pentium M 715 0.16

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 ML-30 110
+4.5%
Pentium M 715 115

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.16
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Turion 64 ML-30 has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium M 715, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-30 and Pentium M 715, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Intel Pentium M 715
Pentium M 715

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Pentium M 715 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-30 or Pentium M 715, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.