Celeron N4000 vs Turion 64 ML-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000C Celeron N4020 Celeron N4020C

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.16
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
+481%

Celeron N4000 outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32892529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.4314.66
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache128 KB112 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 deg C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-30 0.16
Celeron N4000 0.93
+481%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 ML-30 617
Celeron N4000 2259
+266%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 ML-30 110
Celeron N4000 31.94
+244%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.16 0.93
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4000 has a 481.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-28
Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000
vs
i3-4020Y Core i3 4020Y
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 Pentium 4 M P4-M 1,7
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i3-8145U Core i3 8145U
Atom x5-Z8500 Atom x5 Z8500
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron 3867U Celeron 3867U
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i3-1000NG4 Core i3 1000NG4
A4-1250 A4 1250
vs
Pentium SU2700 Pentium SU2700

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 942 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-30 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.