Celeron M 360 vs Turion 64 ML-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron M 353 Celeron M 360 Celeron M 370 Celeron M 380 Pentium M 725 Pentium M 730 Pentium M 735 Pentium M 740 Pentium M 750 Pentium M 760 Pentium M 770 Pentium M 780

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.17
+21.4%
Celeron M 360
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.14

Turion 64 ML-30 outperforms Celeron M 360 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32713319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Celeron M
Power efficiency0.460.63
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V, 1.004V-1.292V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt21 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 ML-30 0.17
+21.4%
Celeron M 360 0.14

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion 64 ML-30 110
+19.1%
Celeron M 360 131

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.17 0.14
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 21 Watt

Turion 64 ML-30 has a 21.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron M 360, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 ML-30 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 360 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron M 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Intel Celeron M 360
Celeron M 360
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron M 380 Celeron M 380
Celeron M 360 Celeron M 360
vs
Celeron M 340 Celeron M 340
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium M 730 Pentium M 730
Pentium J2900 Pentium J2900
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Core 2 Quad Q9000 Core 2 Quad Q9000
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Core 2 Solo SU3300 Core 2 Solo SU3300
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron N4000 Celeron N4000
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i3-8145U Core i3 8145U
Atom x5-Z8500 Atom x5 Z8500
vs
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Celeron 3867U Celeron 3867U
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i3-1000NG4 Core i3 1000NG4

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Celeron M 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-30 or Celeron M 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.