Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.44
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2024
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
15.82
+999%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 999% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2197442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency20.5852.48
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L2 cache1.5 MBno data
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1493FP8
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)AMD Radeon 880M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.44
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 15.82
+999%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 24659
+998%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 15.82
Integrated graphics card 1.39 19.96
Recency 17 July 2022 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N6211 has -87.5% more threads, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 998.6% higher aggregate performance score, 1336% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.