Celeron N6211 vs G4900T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G4900T
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.47

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21762169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.803.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronElkhart Lake
Power efficiency3.8220.58
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G4900T has 74% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature88 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 610Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900T 1.47
Celeron N6211 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G4900T 2239
Celeron N6211 2245
+0.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.89 1.37
Recency 3 April 2018 17 July 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G4900T has 38% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900T and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900T
Celeron G4900T
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Celeron G4900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900T or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.