Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Celeron M P4500
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2774 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.67 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Sable (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 4 July 2008 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron M P4500 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron SI-40, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
