Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 vs Celeron M P4500

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.62
+17%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27772854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency1.681.43
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA988S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.1-1.125V
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4500 0.62
+17%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 0.53

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4500 2533
+28.9%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1965

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4500 4826
+25.7%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 3840

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4500 37.1
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 34.9
+6.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 0.53
Recency 1 April 2010 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

Celeron M P4500 has a 17% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron M P4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 11 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.