Celeron M P4500 vs A6-4400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
+3.2%
Celeron M P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.62

A6-4400M outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27752793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency1.731.68
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache96 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.64
+3.2%
Celeron M P4500 0.62

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-4400M 2292
Celeron M P4500 2533
+10.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A6-4400M 3407
Celeron M P4500 4826
+41.6%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-4400M 46.82
Celeron M P4500 37.1
+26.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-4400M 1
Celeron M P4500 1
+2.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.62
Recency 15 May 2012 1 April 2010

A6-4400M has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 188 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Celeron M P4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.