Phenom II X3 P860 vs Celeron M 520

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3319not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron M3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency0.47no data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release dateno data4 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads13
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data1.5 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization, AMD64, Advanced Virus Protection, SSE(1,2,3,4a)
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 3
Threads 1 3
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 25 Watt

Phenom II X3 P860 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 520 and Phenom II X3 P860, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 520
Celeron M 520
AMD Phenom II X3 P860
Phenom II X3 P860

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 50 votes

Rate Celeron M 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 P860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 520 or Phenom II X3 P860, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.