Celeron M 333 vs M 520
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3377 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Celeron M | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.48 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 520 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 520 and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
